| Posted By |
Discussion Topic: Lathams throw back Thursday's
Similar Threads That Might Help :
Throw away your Corks !!!|
teddy throwing|
Dont throw stones|
Forecast For Thursday|
Broads Bill in Parliament Thursday 7th Feb|
Broads Bill in Parliament Thursday 7th Feb|
-- Page:
1
2
3
|
|
steve |
|
Moderator
Posts: 10551
Joined: Jan 2005
|
Hi all ,
We all love lathams , you have every intention of going in there for one item but end up coming out with several items bit like arkwrights store lol , but lathams Facebook page have been doing a Thursday throw back with history pictures ,
steve and vicky
( apparently a moaner)
View Full Size Image
|
|
steve |
|
Moderator
Posts: 10551
Joined: Jan 2005
|
No2
steve and vicky
( apparently a moaner)
View Full Size Image
|
|
steve |
|
Moderator
Posts: 10551
Joined: Jan 2005
|
No3
steve and vicky
( apparently a moaner)
View Full Size Image
|
|
Paladine |
|
Mudplug Juggler
Posts: 7770
Joined: Jul 2008
Add To Ignore List
|
It's a place that is living on its reputation, I'm afraid. 15 (or more) years ago, they did very good lines in Doulton china (seconds) and end-of-line brand-named clothing (with the labels cut out), etc. Then I think they had a change of buyer. Those bargains disappeared and it became just another QD store, but a bit scruffier than most of them. A few big-name brand items of clothing (with the labels cut out) have started to re-appear recently, but on nowhere near the same scale.
I used to be able to just 'pop in' for one item and end up spending close on £100 on the bargains, but no longer.
And their refund policy is they only take back defective goods. Buy an item of clothing and find out when you get home that it doesn't fit...tough. OK, so they are within their rights, but Roy's, M&S, Next, and just about all the major retailers, have a more liberal policy.
"..for the avoidance of any doubt, the broads are not legally a national park and do not come under the national park legislation, and nor will they."
Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for DEFRA (Hansard 2015)
|
|
bikerinky |
|
Forum Regular
Posts: 151
Joined: Jun 2014
Add To Ignore List
|
just love looking at old norfolk pic but i wish they would get their facts right, i cannot for the life of me see a rover 2000!!!! i see the beetle, the moggy a zepher and i think a hillman minx.....just no rover.
or have i gone blind?
Ian boating since 1961
|
|
steve |
|
Moderator
Posts: 10551
Joined: Jan 2005
|
And today's throw back Thursday picture
steve and vicky
( apparently a moaner)
View Full Size Image
|
|
TerryTibbs |
|
Harnser Trainer
Posts: 6915
Joined: Jul 2007
.JPG)
Add To Ignore List
|
Possibly a Rover 95 there but no 2000 for sure
Dave
if it is to be it is up to me.
|
|
billmaxted |
|
Mudplug Juggler
Posts: 8957
Joined: Mar 2005
Add To Ignore List
|
And I never knew that there was such a great chance to raise the height of the bridge.
Anyone else call in to pick replacement Pink, Green, Blue or Yellow Dawn plates etc. to fill the gaps of broken ones, at a fraction of the price the yard would charge for breakages?
Bill...(The Ancient Mardler)
|
|
Steve51 |
|
Mardles sometimes
Posts: 3381
Joined: Dec 2006
Add To Ignore List
|
Having owned a number of cars of that period including 2 P4 Rovers (a 90 and a 100), it isn't a 95 and definitely not a 2000. I'm fairly sure it's a '59-on facelift model Standard Ensign. I've also owned 2 of the other cars in that picture, a Morris Minor and a Ford Consul Mk2.
Steve. CM1 and NR12
|
|
billmaxted |
|
Mudplug Juggler
Posts: 8957
Joined: Mar 2005
Add To Ignore List
|
I would have said that the car on the extreme right was a Humber either Hawk or Snipe, an earlier one with wrap round rear window, what's behind the Consul I would not like to say.
Bill...(The Ancient Mardler)
|
Reply to Discussion
Mar-08-2018 @ 10:59 AM
