The Norfolk BroadsThe Norfolk Broads
Username Password
Norfolk Broads Weather

Mon, 11 Apr 2016 7:20 am BST- Light Rain
5 Day Forecast

Wind 2.0 mph @ 40°
48.0°F/8.89°C Humidity 93% Pressure 29.65 (S)

Welcome to The Norfolk Broads Forum
This is THE Worlds Largest Forum devoted to the Norfolk Broads, here you can discuss issues about the Norfolk Broads. Or just somewhere to chat with others interested in the Norfolk Broads area. In 2015 forum members spent 2,048 days afloat on the Broads

Please Help Support The Norfolk Broads Forum
OR

The Norfolk Broads Forum / Broads Authority Issues / BA Wins Planning Appeal
login
join
Graphics Off
Search
Forum Members - Book your Hoseasons holiday today, Just call 0345 498 6296

This is a moderated forum Reply to this DiscussionReply to Discussion | Start new discussionNew Discussion << previous || next >> 
Posted By Discussion Topic: BA Wins Planning Appeal

Similar Threads That Might Help :
Fund raising - win - win situation | BA are going to plan| Planning Application BA/2012/0258/FUL| Great Yarmouth Hurricane Appeal.| Bone Marrow Appeal| Hathor Appeal|

-- Page: 1 2 3

book mark this topic Printer-friendly Version  send this discussion to a friend  new posts last

Helmsman1946
Jan-20-2018 @ 12:42 PM                           Permalink
reply
edit
profile
send p.m.
Forum Regular
Posts: 869
Joined: Oct 2006
Helmsman1946
          

Add To Ignore List
With a huge number of public comments the most I have seen for some time
http://www.edp24.co.uk/news/environment/broads-family-s-heartbreak-at-having-to-get-rid-of-dream-garden-1-5362870

Peter

Helmsman1946
Jan-20-2018 @ 1:42 PM                           Permalink
reply
edit
profile
send p.m.
Forum Regular
Posts: 869
Joined: Oct 2006
Helmsman1946
          

Add To Ignore List
Interesting as an application to change use was agreed to in 2013 BA/2013/0271/CU so something must have rocked the boat since (the article was updated at 10.52 to cover this)


Peter

This message was edited by Helmsman1946  on Jan-20-18 @ 12:49 PM

turnoar
Jan-20-2018 @ 2:04 PM                           Permalink
reply
edit
profile
send p.m.
Forum Regular
Posts: 301
Joined: Oct 2010
turnoar
          

Add To Ignore List
There must be a sandpit in there somewhere which they buried their heads in when embarking on this. Reeding between the lines it looks like they went overbroad on the planting, a field sewn with wildflowers or allowing natural meadow to take hold would probably have been acceptable. Perhaps allowing a fleet of deer in would be the most economical way now to raze it to the ground and start over?

Marshman
Jan-20-2018 @ 4:16 PM                           Permalink
reply
edit
profile
send p.m.
Mardles sometimes
Posts: 3563
Joined: Oct 2006
Marshman
          

Add To Ignore List
A quick check on the internet quickly establishes that buying a field does not constitute authority to turn agricultural land into a garden - neither can you by planting 300+ fruit trees suddenly make that into agricultural land again!!

Why is it that some people still do not think planning rules apply to them???

eddybear
Jan-20-2018 @ 7:49 PM                           Permalink
reply
edit
profile
send p.m.
Forum Regular
Posts: 156
Joined: Aug 2009
eddybear
          

Add To Ignore List
I can't understand why they have to up route the apple trees, especially as the BA Insists this has to be returned to agricultural land basically farming I suppose, so it's an orchard we grew up on a farm and guess what it was a fruit farm with orchards, so why can't they Keep the b****y Trees, gormless Broads authority, rant over.

All the best Ted.

This message was edited by steve on Jan-20-18 @ 8:22 PM

hedgehog
Jan-20-2018 @ 12:49 AM                           Permalink
reply
edit
profile
send p.m.
Forum Regular
Posts: 210
Joined: Mar 2012
          

Add To Ignore List
Simples. Because the rules that are in place apply to everyone. Why is that so difficult to understand?

Marshman
Jan-21-2018 @ 9:01 AM                           Permalink
reply
edit
profile
send p.m.
Mardles sometimes
Posts: 3563
Joined: Oct 2006
Marshman
          

Add To Ignore List
Quite!!

Cocklegat
Jan-21-2018 @ 12:03 PM                           Permalink
reply
edit
profile
send p.m.
Forum Regular
Posts: 442
Joined: May 2010
          

Add To Ignore List
Well done the BA.  The 'right' to call yourself an 'Authority' ONLY comes when standards are maintained.  The BA was completely justified in stopping this development.  If you understand just where this land is in relation to the Broad  and its environmental sensitivity you will see that any development here is inappropriate.

Islander
Jan-21-2018 @ 1:41 PM                           Permalink
reply
edit
profile
send p.m.
Forum Regular
Posts: 415
Joined: Jun 2015
          

Add To Ignore List
I do wonder what else this couple would do next if they had won the appeal. Swimming pool, tennis court etc etc. I doubt they will have to sell to pay for putting things right.

Colin Cheers

spiderman
Jan-21-2018 @ 8:10 PM                           Permalink
reply
edit
profile
send p.m.
Forum Regular
Posts: 458
Joined: Sep 2013
          

Add To Ignore List
Cover it with solar panels that's the crop of choice on prime agricultural land round are way.
We'll have nothing to eat but we can use the co2 we save on power production on transporting our grub from abroad simples as they say  LOL

PAGE: 1 2 3

Home Photo Gallery Days Afloat Contact Us
Chat Room Downloads Norfolk Broads @ Amazon Make My Logo
Shops & Businesses Members Gear Norfolk Broads @ EBay Holiday Calendar
Pub Guide Tide Tables SOS List Popular Threads
2017 Calendar Contest Make A Donation Links Hireboat Info
Norfolk Broads @ CafePress FAQ Broads Quiz Forum Events
Advertise With Us Forum Shop Boating Bits Stickys and FAQs Boating Bits Hirecraft List

 

 

 



Copyright © 2005 Y2KInternet, All Rights Reserved.