The Norfolk BroadsThe Norfolk Broads
Username Password
Norfolk Broads Weather

Mon, 11 Apr 2016 7:20 am BST- Light Rain
5 Day Forecast

Wind 2.0 mph @ 40°
48.0°F/8.89°C Humidity 93% Pressure 29.65 (S)

Welcome to The Norfolk Broads Forum
This is THE Worlds Largest Forum devoted to the Norfolk Broads, here you can discuss issues about the Norfolk Broads. Or just somewhere to chat with others interested in the Norfolk Broads area. In 2015 forum members spent 2,048 days afloat on the Broads

Please Help Support The Norfolk Broads Forum
OR

The Norfolk Broads Forum / Broads Authority Issues / Who Owns The River Yare? It's Not The BA Anymore!!
login
join
Graphics Off
Search
Forum Members - Book your Hoseasons holiday today, Just call 0345 498 6296

This is a moderated forum Reply to this DiscussionReply to Discussion | Start new discussionNew Discussion << previous || next >> 
Posted By Discussion Topic: Who Owns The River Yare? It's Not The BA Anymore!!

Similar Threads That Might Help :
Who Owns The River Yare? It's Not The BA Anymore!!| Otters, Not Sure Anymore| Flood Alert - River Waveney & River Yare| New to boat owning but not new to broads| BA beef up patrols of The Yare|

-- Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

book mark this topic Printer-friendly Version  send this discussion to a friend  new posts last

Freako
Jul-19-2005 @ 11:17 PM                           Permalink
reply
edit
profile
send p.m.
Forum Regular
Posts: 273
Joined: Apr 2005
Freako
          

Add To Ignore List
With regard to the skiers or boarders or A*******s as I call them, they cost me a new tele on Saturday, we were just about to turn into Rockland Broad as a boarder came passed, talk about rock the boat, off comes our tv, crashed on the floor, now I'm out of pocket to the tune of a new one, to add to my troubles my mobile phone decided to go for a swim. The have no regard for anyone but themselves, I was talking in the riverside shop at Brundall and was told by a guy who knows some of them that they get as close to the boats as possible on purpose just to see how much they can get them to roll. Not on Guys.

The Budgie Man

Boatboy
Jul-20-2005 @ 12:34 AM                           Permalink
reply
edit
profile
send p.m.
Mardles sometimes
Posts: 3906
Joined: Apr 2005
Boatboy
          

Add To Ignore List
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE

Make sure that every incident relating to water skiing or wake boarding which causes risk or damage to person or property is reported to the Broads Authority. Detail exactly what damage is done and if possible include boat registration numbers

make those responsible at BA HQ are sick to the back teeth of doing nothing all day but reading reports of these incidents. Then, and only then will they act.

How to report these incidents is well documented on other threads here.

billmaxted
Jul-20-2005 @ 7:36 AM                           Permalink
reply
edit
profile
send p.m.
Mudplug Juggler
Posts: 8741
Joined: Mar 2005
billmaxted
          

Add To Ignore List
Not good news Keith, sorry your trip was marred. This does make me mad, by local standards a lot of money has been spent this year on trying to promote the southern rivers, the Yare in particular. There was the Wherryman's Way initiative, Improved moorings and facilities at Whitlingham, Investment in the Yacht Stations at Nowich and Yarmouth, Possible improvements to the water bus service and a lot of money spent on Publicity.

What have we got? Yobs being a Pest in Norwich, inconsiderate lunatics roaring about, letters in the press about how bad it is, guys on the bank with polls long enough to reach the otherside (What's with these polls? Are the owners not bright enough to learn to cast properly or something?) and flood relief scehemes which make mooring and use on the river less safe.

With the closure of southern based hire fleets local businesses were already feeling the pinch especially when there was not low water midday at Yarmouth. The one thing we thought we could offer was tranquility. Not so it seems at times at least.

Yet again we have, to my mind, an example of disco-ordinated activity (or lack of it) on the part of the Broads Authority.

As a planning authority themselves, you really would have thought that they would have ensured that risk assessment in relation to proposals concerning security would have been addressed in the projects they were associated with.

As a navigation authority you really would have thought that the brief for the trial period for high speed water use would have addressed safety issues.

As a conservation body in areas where Angling is common place you really would have thought that they would have made sensible provisions so that reedbeds are not damaged and the banks not dispoiled.

But oh no, I guess they will just set up another committee to decide how best to restructure themselves to ensure that the committee that is then formed comprises yet more people that have little knowledge of what they are addressing.

"If you are going to be like that, Darling, I won't let you be the Captain any more!"  Bill...

yateley
Jul-20-2005 @ 7:54 AM                           Permalink
reply
edit
profile
send p.m.
Knows Their Stuff
Founding Member
Posts: 148
Joined: Aug 2004
yateley
          

Add To Ignore List
Keith, Freako,

As a frequent user of the Yare I have also experienced what you recounted. I echo Boatboy's plea that you report the wakeboarders. I have and the BA seem to be taking it seriously. They are requesting documented evidence if possible (photos or video) and I will certainly be taking my cameras next time. Send a complaint to as many BA people as posible so that they really get the message.

Harry

Just try and keep it on the wet bit dear . . . .

craigspc2000
Jul-20-2005 @ 2:06 PM                           Permalink
reply
edit
profile
send p.m.
Forum Regular
Posts: 315
Joined: Apr 2005
craigspc2000
          

Add To Ignore List
This really sounds bad.  Sorry to hear of all the problems that these people are causing over there.  

Page 19 and 20 of the Speed Limit Byelaws 1992 covers where and when people can ski/wakeboard, but of course, this doesn't help with the problem.  

Craig

This message was edited by craigspc2000 on Jul-20-05 @ 2:07 PM

Realaler
Jul-20-2005 @ 4:33 PM                           Permalink
reply
edit
profile
send p.m.
Forum Regular
Posts: 460
Joined: Jan 2005
Realaler
          

Add To Ignore List
Sorry to read of your depressing odyssey through our local waters, Keith, but glad that an outsider has brought this to attention. I'm afraid that the upper Middle Yare from Cantley Reach to Postwick Viaduct is rapidly becoming a no-go area for conventional navigators, nature lovers, cyclists, walkers, and all other who are prepared to enjoy broadland without destroying its charm for the rest.
The Wakers seemed to have turned Train Reach into Suicide Alley, and the major match fishing consortium which has taken over the South bank between Rockland and the Langley means that most weekends you'll be running a gauntlet of 35-40 feet carbon rods, accompanied by a chorus of four letter words.
Yes, it seems that this otherwise beautiful section of the Yare Valley has become a concentrated ghetto for all that's worst about human behaviour on the Broads. And while the rest of you may find it preferable to have the social delinquents conveniently crammed into one place, I and others have to live there.
Its not as if we (I certainly don't) regard Wake boarding or match fishing as something inherently wrong.
Wake-boarding is obviously a super sport and very demanding, and I'd be quite happy to have it in my back yard, so long as that 'yard' wasn't less than 200 feet wide and part of a public navigation used by absolute beginners, children and novice hirers. I suppose that goes for the big black pole barmy army as well?
All I can say is: don't let them drive you away. There are signs of hope and it surely can't get much worse. The Wherryman's Way initiative has been a valuable regenerative measure, and the Yare boasts some of the most dedicated ranger staff at the BA. If we we just persuade their bosses to untie their hands and let them do the job?


Bounty
Jul-20-2005 @ 5:16 PM                           Permalink
reply
edit
profile
send p.m.
Forum Regular
Posts: 340
Joined: May 2005
Bounty
          

Add To Ignore List
As Bill is one of the most regular posters on the forum, I tend to regard his comments with some authority. And I would say I agree with his responses on most topics most of the time. This time However, I think he has it absolutely spot on. There is simply no reason or escuse for the broads being damaged (and our pleasure as well) by Skiers or wakeboarders. They have huge areas of waterways that can be used without upsetting others.

Maybe we really should start making complaints/reporting those that clearly have no intention of protecting the environment of the broads. For God's sake, we are being either discouraged, or stopped from using parts of the waterway to protect the environment and this seems to be policed. Surely that same level of vigilance can be applied to those creating far more destruction.

I have a somewhat biased view about fishermen, so I'll avoind comment on that one Wink

bartonbill
Jul-20-2005 @ 7:48 PM                           Permalink
reply
edit
profile
send p.m.
Forum Regular
Posts: 154
Joined: May 2005
bartonbill
          

Add To Ignore List
could someone please explain why the river rangers dont put a stop to the wake boarders,and it would seem that the guys on the darkside are singing from the same hym sheet,well said bill !!!

no i said forwards !!! whoops !!

osdguy
Jul-20-2005 @ 8:04 PM                           Permalink
reply
edit
profile
send p.m.
Been Posting For a Long Time
Posts: 1738
Joined: Jul 2005
osdguy
          

Add To Ignore List
Just out of curiousity has the BA ever prosecuted for speeding or dangerous handling of river craft?
A google search revealed they do prosecute but for planning infringements or they put out enforcement notices for slipway works.
Couldn't find one mention of speeding prosecutions, and if that is the case until someone ends up in court then surely the abusers of the Broads will continue to abuse as there is no will by the enforcing authority to actually enforce it's own by-laws.
Prosecutions would do 2 things, increase coffers by fines and deter abusers.

In 4 weekends out I have not seen 1 BA launch in the Horning area, pretty hard to enforce when you have no presence......surely the tolls we pay entitle us to a bit of "policing" and to ensure the broads are protected.

In fairness last year we had late night call to the emergency services due to a hire craft doing his utmost best to take out boats moored at Stokesby when it was pitch black (approx 11pm) - the next morning first thing BA were on the phone to us, asking our route for the day and there was a BA launch at Horning ready to take a statement and what a credit Robin was to his job and to himself.


regards

Marc (osdguy)

Freako
Jul-20-2005 @ 9:20 PM                           Permalink
reply
edit
profile
send p.m.
Forum Regular
Posts: 273
Joined: Apr 2005
Freako
          

Add To Ignore List
I recall reading about two hire craft users who were proscuted for speeding on the river Ant, I remember thinking how high the fine was, I think somewhere in the region of £4000. I must say I regularly see rangers on river Yare on a daily basis, and actually saw one stop a boat that was not showing a current licence.

The Budgie Man

PAGE: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

Home Photo Gallery Days Afloat Contact Us
Chat Room Downloads Norfolk Broads @ Amazon Make My Logo
Shops & Businesses Members Gear Norfolk Broads @ EBay Holiday Calendar
Pub Guide Tide Tables SOS List Popular Threads
2017 Calendar Contest Make A Donation Links Hireboat Info
Norfolk Broads @ CafePress FAQ Broads Quiz Forum Events
Advertise With Us Forum Shop Boating Bits Stickys and FAQs Boating Bits Hirecraft List

 

 

 



Copyright © 2005 Y2KInternet, All Rights Reserved.