Topic: Have a safe weekend


steve    -- Apr-30-2021 @ 6:57 PM
  From BA Facebook page
If you are visiting the Broads this bank holiday weekend please have a safe one.

Over the coming months we will be highlighting questionable behaviour caught on CCTV at our Yacht Stations to help raise awareness of the dangers of the water.

In this clip filmed at Norwich Yacht Station in 2019, some hirers visiting the area on holiday are towing a child behind their boat in an inflatable without a care in the world.

This is unsafe on the Broads at the best of times, but even more dangerous is that those skippering the boat didn't turn back once to make sure the daughter was safe, and then proceeded to turn the large craft around in the channel outside Pull's Ferry with daughter still in tow.

A very bad idea considering the proximity of fast-moving prop on the back of the boat to the inflatable, the possibility of the inflatable's line obstructing other river users, and that fact that the daughter could capsize easily without them knowing.

Broads Authority Quay Assistant Dave attempted to highlight the dangers of the situation to the skipper, but to no avail.

We have comprehensive safety information and video clips on our website, and Broads Control is available on 01603 756056 if you need assistance.

https://www.broads-authority.gov.uk/boating/navigating-the-broads/boating-essentials

steve and vicky
( apparently a moaner)


Paladine    -- Apr-30-2021 @ 7:40 PM
 
The video was recorded 2 years ago. Why has it only just been published? I don't suppose it's anything to do with the BNA trying to impress the MAIB that they are serious about water safety. I hardly think 'naming and shaming' in this fashion is appropriate.

"..for the avoidance of any doubt, the broads are not legally a national park and do not come under the national park legislation, and nor will they."
Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for DEFRA (Hansard 2015)


Hylander    -- Apr-30-2021 @ 8:45 PM
  The video is there a link to it please.



Women dont nag they just
point
things out...



M


Paladine    -- Apr-30-2021 @ 9:29 PM
 
It’s on the BNA FB page.

"..for the avoidance of any doubt, the broads are not legally a national park and do not come under the national park legislation, and nor will they."
Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for DEFRA (Hansard 2015)


bitterncloud    -- May-1-2021 @ 5:23 AM
  The logic of posting it is explained in the post above and looking at the Facebook comments it has got people thinking about the risks which I suppose is what they wanted.

Also given that no one is named, how is it ‘naming and shaming’??

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pompous


Paladine    -- May-1-2021 @ 5:42 AM
 
‘Naming and shaming’ is simply a generic term for the BNA’s behaviour. From the video clip that has been published, the name of the hire boat can be seen, as well as the time and date of the incident. The faces of the two people on the boat can be seen clearly enough to be identified (including the helmsman). It would be a simply matter to identify them. I wonder what the Information Commissioner would have to say about it. Rules on the use of CCTV  data are very strict.

"..for the avoidance of any doubt, the broads are not legally a national park and do not come under the national park legislation, and nor will they."
Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for DEFRA (Hansard 2015)


bitterncloud    -- May-1-2021 @ 7:08 AM
  Fair enough - I think I will drop them an email about it. Hadn’t thought it was very clear but perhaps my eyesight is a bit naff!!

Out of interest what are the legalities with things like the various online Broads webcams paladine?

I like the idea of this though, seems to have had success with other councils ‘shaming’ things like vans fly tipping commercial waste. If anything it’ll raise awareness hopefully.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pompous


Paladine    -- May-1-2021 @ 8:42 AM
 
"Out of interest what are the legalities with things like the various online Broads webcams..."

Each case would be judged separately. It very much depends on whether the installation is by a private individual or by a business/organisation; has the installation been registered; what is the purpose of the installation; are any data recorded; what is the purpose for which that data are recorded; has the data been used for some other purpose, etc.

There is a useful guide on the ICO web site https://ico.org.uk/media/for-organisations/documents/1542/cctv-code-of-practice.pdf Of particular note are the sections relating to disclosure and retention of the data.

Data protection is something of a minefield, and the BNA might just have stepped onto a mine.

"..for the avoidance of any doubt, the broads are not legally a national park and do not come under the national park legislation, and nor will they."
Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for DEFRA (Hansard 2015)


This message was edited by Paladine on May-1-21 @ 9:43 AM


bitterncloud    -- May-1-2021 @ 8:47 AM
  Interesting. They’ve replied now, appreciated the message and said that the blurred video is on YouTube now instead.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pompous


Paladine    -- May-1-2021 @ 8:53 AM
 
Well, it seems that someone in the BNA takes note of what we say. That non-compliant video has now been edited to blur the faces of the holiday-makers, and the time and date have been removed. I hope someone got a talking to.

"..for the avoidance of any doubt, the broads are not legally a national park and do not come under the national park legislation, and nor will they."
Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for DEFRA (Hansard 2015)


This message was edited by Paladine on May-1-21 @ 9:55 AM


Paladine    -- May-1-2021 @ 8:55 AM
 
For those who don't 'do' FB...

"..for the avoidance of any doubt, the broads are not legally a national park and do not come under the national park legislation, and nor will they."
Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for DEFRA (Hansard 2015)


Paladine    -- May-1-2021 @ 3:25 PM
 
Although the BNA has edited its video to blur out the faces of the people involved, there is still the question of retention of data and use other than for the registered purpose.

I suspect the registered purpose was for security and, possibly, monitoring vessels mooring at the Yacht Station. Ad hoc recording of passing boats, on the off-chance someone might be doing something silly is, I suggest, a highly unlikely purpose.

The incident took place in April 2019. Although there is no statutory limit on how long data may be retained, it should only be retained for the time it is relevant to the registered purpose. I hardly think 2 years is appropriate in any case not involving court action. I will be sending a copy of the video to the ICO's office for their opinion.

"..for the avoidance of any doubt, the broads are not legally a national park and do not come under the national park legislation, and nor will they."
Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for DEFRA (Hansard 2015)


This message was edited by Paladine on May-1-21 @ 4:26 PM


JollyRodger    -- May-1-2021 @ 7:21 PM
  I presume that someone has had time on their hands during lockdown. I wonder just how much time was spent trawling through hours and hours of security tapes?

Jolly Rodger


Paladine    -- May-17-2021 @ 4:30 PM
 
I have received a lengthy email from the Broads No-Authority Data Protection Officer, the salient points of which are:

”I have reviewed the timeline, the original posted content and I have concluded  that this error has resulted in a breach of data protection and the actions have fallen short of our normally high reporting standards.

I have reported this matter to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO)...

...Following this recent error, I have put in place a number of safeguards to prevent this type of low level data breach happening again and we will be reviewing any retained CCTV images to ensure data retention passes GDPR and Data Protection.

These new processes have been provided to the ICO as part of the self-reporting format.”


I have been in contact with the ICO’s office. The actions the BNA has now taken are deemed to be acceptable, although the retention of the data for 2 years raised an eyebrow, as being an excessive period of time.

Hopefully, those actions will include giving the media team lessons on data handling! I would have thought that such knowledge of the data legislation would have been a requisite for any candidate for the job.


"..for the avoidance of any doubt, the broads are not legally a national park and do not come under the national park legislation, and nor will they."
Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for DEFRA (Hansard 2015)


This message was edited by Paladine on May-17-21 @ 5:31 PM


The Norfolk Broads Forum : http://www.the-norfolk-broads.co.uk
Topic: http://www.the-norfolk-broads.co.uk/viewmessages.cfm?Forum=48&Topic=44190